Recent controversy reported in the Australian Newspaper in this article focussed on a large grant awarded by the Australian Research Grants Council to a proselytising social "scientist". The recipient, Professor Riaz (Risible) Hassan expressed gratitude that the lavish funds would allow him to interview terrorists in order to prove that his existing beliefs about the causes of terrorism could be verified. Of course, his a priori beliefs about the causes of terrorism seemed to be in accord with those often expressed by terrorists. No surprises there. The simple-minded actions of the ARGC in approving such a grant, and the simple-minded attitudes of the recipient are ample evidence that some social "scientists" are still living in a pre-enlightenment, or even pre-socratic epistemological world. A world of magic and mysticism, where the purpose of "research" is to count the hits and ignore the misses, in order to confirm existing prejudices and superstitions. Note that I am not critical of all social scientists. Some are not ignorant of basic epistemology, and some are out there fighting the good fight.
Humbug! Online: "Wicked Stuff" - Tim van Gelder, and "Irreverent" - Gary Curtis. Want a paperback copy of Humbug! the book? Contact us to order a copy - Only AU$20.00!
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
Faculty follies - ARGC believes in funding beliefs
Recent controversy reported in the Australian Newspaper in this article focussed on a large grant awarded by the Australian Research Grants Council to a proselytising social "scientist". The recipient, Professor Riaz (Risible) Hassan expressed gratitude that the lavish funds would allow him to interview terrorists in order to prove that his existing beliefs about the causes of terrorism could be verified. Of course, his a priori beliefs about the causes of terrorism seemed to be in accord with those often expressed by terrorists. No surprises there. The simple-minded actions of the ARGC in approving such a grant, and the simple-minded attitudes of the recipient are ample evidence that some social "scientists" are still living in a pre-enlightenment, or even pre-socratic epistemological world. A world of magic and mysticism, where the purpose of "research" is to count the hits and ignore the misses, in order to confirm existing prejudices and superstitions. Note that I am not critical of all social scientists. Some are not ignorant of basic epistemology, and some are out there fighting the good fight.
Labels:
by Jef,
Jef's Cartoons
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
FALLACIES
ad hominem
Ambiguity
Appeal to Authority
Appeal to Celebrity
Appeal to Celebrity.
Argument by Artifice
Argument by Slogan
Argument to Consequences
Bad Faith
Begging the Question
Browbeating
Burden of Proof
Burden of solution
Devil's Advocate
Exaggerated Conflict
Factoid Propagation
False Analogy
False Attribution
False Cause; Correlation Error
False Dichotomy
False dilemma
False Positioning
Gibberish
GIGO.
humbug hunting
Hume's Razor
immunised hypothesis
Impugning Motives
Inversion
LAME
Misuse of Information
Moral Equivalence
Moving the Goalposts
Naturalistic Fallacy
Non-sequitur
Occam's Razor
Perfect Solution
Personal Abuse
Poisoning the Well
Popular Opinion
postdiction
Red Flag Faux Pas
Red Herring
Reductio Ad Absurdum
Sanctimony
Self Defeating Argument
Simple-Minded Certitude
Skeptics of Carlos
Slippery Slope
Socratic Method
Special Pleading
Spinning another hypothesis
Stacking the Deck
Straw Man
Substitution
The Devil's Advocate
Unfounded Generalisation
Weasel Words
Wishful Thinking
WTF? Fallacy

0 comments:
Post a Comment