A site for skeptics and critical thinkers. Hundreds of real life examples of fallacies, updated regularly. An eBook version of Humbug! The skeptics’ field guide to spotting fallacies in thinking. A weekly podcast on each fallacy: Hunting Humbug 101 – a crash course in shooting down bad arguments. We take fallacies seriously, but not ourselves.

Sunday, June 06, 2010

Podcast - Hunting Humbug 101: Tutorial 36 - False Attribution

In this podcast we take a look at the fallacy False Attribution. Specific examples include taking a scientist out of context, and deliberately creating a false news report.
The ABC’s Media Watch explains this example in full detail and can be found here - deception detection fallacy.
We also discuss the ‘Ultimate False Attribution‘.

2 comments:

goatsfoot said...

Thanks for the podcast, I really enjoyed it. Loved the account of the hoax. Just recommended your podcast to mah tweeps.

I winced at Ben's "anything you say you're guaranteed to offend someone". It's a typical way to disclaim responsibility for the effect your words have on others. (And it's simply not true that everything you say is offensive.) No one has the "right" not to be offended, it's true, negative freedom, but balanced with that, people have the right to live without fear and hatred and denigration, positive freedom.

Some people are more vulnerable to hate-words than others, there's no absolute moral right to not cause harm to others, but I'd call it the mark of a decent human being to try not to. Of course it's often debatable when something causes harm or not, but calling everyone equally fair game from the outset ignores the very un-level playing field we're living on. Not that I'm saying Ben was necessarily arguing this, just using it as a springboard to discuss a common point of debate! And when two fairly powerful factions in an argument are at each others' throats (rather than more powerful picking on the dispossessed), hate and disrespect might bring short-term satisfaction but it mightn't do much for healing relations, there's no absolute "right" in the matter, but those speaking really should own to possible consequences.

Of course, there's also the playground-esque "do words really hurt?" question some ask, with the implication that those who are hurt are simply sensitive and need to get a life and spine. All I can say to those who think words can't cause/excacerbate/ignite/reinforce real-world harm is: maaate, what fortunate cotton-wool cocoon/sphere of experience are you living in?

Daniel said...

I miss your podcast, Theo. I understand why it would be hard to bring it back, though. I hope you're well.